Understanding Goon: Nice Guys Finish First

Goon Image

We’re resisting the urge to make a Stifler joke here…

I had the pleasure of writing this review with my friend and colleague at Queen’s University, Marty Clark. Marty is an emerging scholar in the field of Hockey Studies and a hell of a nice guy in his own right. His research focuses primarily on conceptions of whiteness within the NHL and his PhD dissertation examines how race is constructed in hockey through the media representations of Gordie Howe. Hopefully we can convince Marty to grace Hockey in Society’s pages on a regular basis…

We recently caught up with Goon (2012), a film about a Massachusetts bouncer named Doug Glatt (played by Seann William Scott) who literally fights his way into a role as a minor hockey league enforcer.  There has been no shortage of reviews and commentaries on Goon since the film entered the public consciousness well before it’s February 24th release date (including excellent posts from Hockey in Society’s own Courtney Szto and Mark Norman). We wanted to check out Goon because it entered theatres at a particularly interesting time given the NHL’s 2011 ‘Summer of Sorrow,’ the ongoing debates surrounding brain injuries, the murky state of Sidney Crosby’s season, and Brian Burke’s recent efforts to address homophobia in professional hockey.  We think this film is worthy of a lengthy discussion because of how it easily diffuses these potentially disruptive issues while reinforcing traditional ideas about hockey, violence and the role of the goon.

Co-Author’s Note: We get it.  Our affinity for the sociology of sport makes it almost inevitable that what follows will be a critical take on the film’s representation of hockey violence. But, as fans of hockey that grew up on films like Slap Shot (1977), we can certainly appreciate both sport and film, especially when they are entertaining.  And we will be the first to admit that there are particular scenes in Goon that made us laugh: a well-timed reference to Rudy (1993) is part of the sometimes charming romantic side plot that is the source of many of the film’s best moments – a lot of us can undoubtedly relate to Doug’s awkwardness and unrelenting politeness in pursuit of his love interest Eva (played by Allison Pill). Film veteran Liev Schreiber was especially good as Ross ‘The Boss’ Rhea, the aging, chain-smoking enforcer who imparts wisdom to Doug in some of Goon’s most memorable (and thoughtful) scenes. It took very little time for Marty (our resident Winnipegger) to recall that Goon was filmed in Winnipeg, leading him to spend most of his time identifying landmarks and reveling in the recurring role of Curt Keilback (longtime voice of the Jets). There is also a heartwarming infusion of Canadian content throughout the film including cameos by the Trailer Park Boys and a soundtrack featuring Canadian rock staples Chilliwack, Sloan and Rush (Matt couldn’t resist pumping his fist when “Working Man” blasted over the theatre’s sound system).

Cute Canadiana aside, we were ultimately disappointed with Goon.  To begin, it must be pointed out that Jay Baruchel (who has been great in other films) is painfully annoying as Doug’s foul-mouthed friend Ryan.  Perhaps not surprisingly the film is overflowing with several worn-out hockey stereotypes – the culturally-awkward Russians, the quirky goalie, the Asian teammate paying for med school, the washed-up, drunk and divorced veteran captain, and of course the goons.  The film’s biggest drawback is epitomized in a scene that sets Doug’s career as a goon in motion.  Doug attends a minor league “tryout” wearing a pair of white figure skates.  His choice of equipment (and the fact that he can’t skate) provokes the expected verbal onslaught from the team’s players and whips Doug into a violent frenzy.  He proceeds to systematically beat up several members of the team, impressing the coach and cementing his spot on the roster as the team’s goon. Under any other circumstances we might have walked out of the theatre at this point because, simply put, the scene is terrible.  However, we settled into our seats as Doug settled into his role as a goon because we both thought this film says something powerful and ultimately problematic about hockey violence and the role of the goon.

Goon’s overarching message is that hockey’s unwritten code of conduct (or ‘Code of Honour,’ or simply ‘The Code’) is an essential aspect of the game and should be celebrated as such.  This message is nothing new, of course.  But, importantly, this message relies entirely on the tired and unsubstantiated idea that hockey players are just ‘nice guys.’ This, in turn, continues to reinforce dominant understandings of white men as ‘men of character.’

Goon’s tagline reads: “Meet Doug. The Nicest Guy You Will Ever Fight.” Doug’s unrelenting ‘niceness’ is made clear in several ways throughout the film: he says ‘thank you’ at an excessive rate; he is overly chivalrous; and he often apologizes to those on the receiving end of his fists.  In an interview on CBC’s Q with Jian Ghomeshi, Ghomeshi asks Baruchel (also co-creator of Goon) how important it was to sell the paradox of a “brute who’s a kitten off the ice?” “It was paramount,” Baruchel responds, “the only way you’re going to get the audience to sort of connect…and maybe even see themselves in Doug is if he’s the most likeable, mild-mannered guy in the world. And in my experience the hardest guys in hockey are that.”

Goon does not work if Doug is a wild and angry man.  He must be nice in order for us to understand that fighting is the right thing to do.  To understand this point we can look closer at Doug’s “fall from grace” (the classic narrative hitch used to set up the film’s climax) when he loses control of his emotions and wildly beats an opponent to a bloody pulp. Skating off the ice covered in blood, Doug is visibly shaken by what he has just done.  Dirty and shamed, he must be punished for straying from ‘The Code.’ He is made to sit at the back of the team’s bus (near the “piss hole”) and is suspended for one game  (*Spoiler Alert* Doug finds redemption as he settles back into his role as a goon and fights Rhea.  This one fight single-handedly sets the team straight and allows them to attain success).

Doug is able to cast aside potential challenges to hockey’s traditions because he is a nice guy, because he occupies the moral high ground. It was quite telling that, the day before we watched this film, a lot of media coverage was dedicated to Sidney Crosby’s potential return from his season-long “battle with concussion-like symptoms.” Within this context, the treatment of concussions in Goon makes powerful statements about the consequences for these types of injuries and their cultural significance. Not surprisingly, despite withstanding an unfathomable number of blows to the head, as well as a slap shot in the teeth, Doug is never shown to have a concussion and no mention is made of head trauma outside of his superficial injuries. In contrast to the hypermasculine enforcer, flamboyant French Canadian hot shot Xavier LaFlamme (played by Marc-Andre Grondin) sustains two concussions over the course of the season; in fact, Doug is signed by Halifax for the sole purpose of protecting the skittish LaFlamme and helping to ease the young sniper’s fears of getting another concussion.

The only explicit discussion of hockey’s concussion debate comes when Doug’s father (played by a severely underutilized Eugene Levy) asks the now popular goon if he has considered the risks of head injuries. This line of questioning from Doug’s father, an uptight, middle-class, Jewish doctor, leads Doug into an emotional speech extolling the virtues of ‘The Code’ and defending his legitimacy as a hockey player. With these passionate words, the potential for the concussion debate to emerge as a counter-narrative within the film is quickly dissolved. In the meantime, significant contrasts are drawn between Doug and his father/LaFlamme; where Doug’s mastery of hockey’s masculine code of honour allows him to stand on moral high ground, his father and LaFlamme must “learn The Code” to demonstrate that they truly understand the game (*Spoiler Alert* Only one of them is successful).

Doug’s speech to his family appeals largely to the inherent good that comes from his role as the team’s protector. These sentiments are echoed in a later scene that depicts a conversation between Doug and Ross Rhea. The exchange also serves as a possible disruption to the narrative’s momentum as the experienced Rhea warns Doug about the perils that come with being a goon. Rhea’s comments about the disposable nature of the enforcer and the goon’s fleeting status as fan favourite are eerily similar to many of the concerns raised as part of the fallout from the NHL’s ‘Summer of Sorrow.’ Once again, Doug is (politely) resolute in defending his role and invokes notions of pride and “team” in justifying his position. While Rhea brushes off Doug’s loyalty to his team with a sarcastic laugh, ‘The Code’ is gradually re-established as the conversation continues. Destined to fight in a future game, the scene ends with a sign of mutual respect between the two enforcers with an implicit understanding that this respect can only be rightly enacted in a violent fight on the ice.

Doug’s moral high ground thwarts yet another counter narrative to traditional hockey.  Goon’s only gay character is Doug’s non-hockey playing brother Ira (played by Flashpoint’s David Paetkau).  In an early and pivotal scene, Doug (still just a fan in the stands) beats up a hockey player who has uttered a gay slur in his direction.  Using his fists, Doug makes it more than clear that explicit homophobia is wrong.  Once he becomes a hockey player himself, however, Doug remains curiously quiet in the ultra-hetero space of the dressing room.  It is business as usual here; hockey players hurl homophobic and sexist comments at each other.  Yet, these comments are somehow understood in terms of camaraderie and team-building, and hockey’s culture of masculinity goes unchallenged.

Talking with Jian Ghomeshi, Jay Baruchel easily deflects anti-violence critiques aimed at Goon by (much like Doug does) extolling the taken-for-granted virtues of ‘The Code’ and those who enforce it.  Despite this, we think that Goon is saying something powerful about the institution of hockey.  By wittingly casting aside concerns over homophobia, concussions, and fighting, Goon does nothing more than reinforce the idea that goons are nice, honourable guys.  Nice guys like Doug, after all, are incapable of bad things.

About these ads

About mattventresca
Queen's University graduate student and admitted armchair activist. Sports enthusiast. Self-proclaimed critical thinker. Shameless Leafs supporter (although it often leads to shame!). Popular culture aficianado turned sport sociologist (in training). Music lover and avid musician. Enjoys cheesy sports films and documentaries. Does not enjoy writing "About Yourself" profiles.

15 Responses to Understanding Goon: Nice Guys Finish First

  1. Great stuff Matt and Marty. I think this is a really strong review that examines the film’s various messages from a variety of perspectives, and that recognizes both the film’s strong characteristics and its inadequacies. Thanks for co-writing on this Marty!

  2. courtneyszto says:

    Very thorough analysis gentlemen. I’m glad you had a chance to do this for the site.

  3. (My two cents from another post)

    People are going to look at this film from the surface, at the marketing, and say that it is simply a film that glorifies violence and ENDORSES the role of fighting and enforcers in hockey. Those people aren’t looking past the surface. When the director said it’s a love letter to enforcers, I believe it is, not because it says “great job guys, keep up the good work,” but moreso saying “I realize what you have to go through and what your expectations are.” In that way it is truly a love letter.

    Anyways, the film brutally highlights the toll being an enforcer takes on a man. Over the course of the movie Sean William Scott slowly but surely acquires scars and bruises and broken bones, until by the time he finally matches up with Rhea he looks like he shouldn’t even be playing at all. The film is definitely subtle and very reserved in the way that it delivers its messages, hiding themes and statements behind humor, such as when the goalie Belchior famously says “Rule one, don’t touch my percocets, rule two, do you have any percocets?” Jay Baruchel plays a character that in many ways highlights the fact that fighting is mostly only enjoyed by the worst and scummiest type of person in the arena, overgrown manchildren and scumbags.

    Sean William Scott’s character, Doug Glatt, also is shown to not pursue the idea of hitting and fighting people for a living, it’s thrust upon him after a fight in the stands defending his brother. He’s consistently shown to not like fighting, apologizing for hurting people unless they try to hurt his friends or, later on, his teammates. His character even develops something of a Christ complex, willfully allowing himself to be beaten because he feels he did something wrong.

    In the penultimate game we watch the ultimate toll on Doug. He takes a slapshot to the face to save the game, and then uses his battered face to keep the puck out of the net for 10 seconds as sticks are whacked in his face and a player uses his skate to step on his weak ankle. The result of all of this is a painkiller prescription and accolades from his teammates for taking a puck to the face. No one is worried about if he’s alright, just that he got the win because he’s “just a goon.” And as it’s hammered constantly throughout the entire movie to him, from Ross Rhea to Xavier Leflamme’s character, goons are not hockey players.

    I think the scene that best sums up the movie is a dinner scene between Doug, his brother, and his parents after a hockey game where he fights Laraque. His parents are dismissive and disapprove of his profession, calling it a hobby and asking when he’ll become a teacher. Doug says that’s not going to happen because he is stupid, dimwitted, and he’ll never become those things. But he is strong, and he can protect people, and that affords him an opportunity in hockey. Kids buy his jersey, with his name on their back, and cheer him on, he has a place. He basically tells his parents they should accept him for being stupid, and his brother for being gay, and be proud of him. His dad then says that his jersey may as well say security on the back and, presumably, leaves his sons life. This movie is much more nuanced than it gives credit for, and in a way brings two camps to a crossroad.

  4. Pingback: It’s Only Glorified if You Glorify It « Hockey in Society

  5. Adam says:

    Yahhhhhhh. Goon was produced to entertain a mass audience, period. Any analysis of this movie beyond that is, well, I guess everybody has their jobs to do or desires to practice. But I don’t know whether to laugh at or be proud of the intellectual effort expended on this film. I guess I’ll have a nice chuckle AND be proud.

  6. mattventresca says:

    Adam, thanks for reading and commenting. I’m glad that you are at least a tiny bit “proud” of our intellectual labour on this one.
    In response (for what it’s worth), I’ll just say that I really believe that when a film isn’t supposed to be taken seriously or claims to be just for entertainment, it’s even more important that we analyze it in some sort of detail – that’s exactly when powerful claims about the social organization of society often go unnoticed. Of course Goon wasn’t made to make any profound sociological statements about hockey, but in doing just that it presents ways of thinking about the game that are left unquestioned as “just the way it is”…we wrote this review not to transform Goon into something it’s clearly not, but to point out what some of those key assumptions are…

  7. privyleged says:

    Great piece, Matt & Marty!

  8. Pingback: John K. Samson and the intersection of sport, music and politics « Hockey in Society

  9. Pingback: Weekly Links: NHLPA and owners begin CBA negotiations; Social media and hockey analytics; Plans for new arena in Markham « Hockey in Society

  10. Pingback: Weekly Links: Shea Weber signing indicates financial disparities between NHL teams; Homophobic hockey reporter gets criticized; Updates on the Jacob Trouba saga « Hockey in Society

  11. Pingback: It’s Hockey in Society’s One-Year Anniversary! « Hockey in Society

  12. Pingback: Teaching a sociocultural course on hockey at the undergraduate level: Thoughts on course content and critically engaging students « Hockey in Society

  13. Pingback: Weekly Links: Sochi Olympics news; NHL stars on Russia’s anti-gay laws; Leetch and Burke join NHL’s Department of Player Safety | Hockey in Society

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s