I only said “SLIGHT concussion”: Mike Milbury calls for injurious violence in NHL Playoffs

By Victoria Silverwood

Last night as San Jose Sharks played the St Louis Blues in the Western Conference final of the Stanley Cup Playoffs, Mike Milbury, hockey analyst for NBCSN made the following statement:

“This is so unsatisfying for me as a former coach to watch a player with a slash that doesn’t really hurt him. If you’re going to slash him, crack a bone or something. If you’re going to hit somebody from behind, give him a slight concussion or whatever. I don’t mean that obviously too seriously, but just something!”

Mike Milbury

Milbury was clearly unaware of the response these comments would provoke, claiming that he was simply being facetious and will, I imagine, be back-tracking on them fairly swiftly this morning.

Is this an issue?  What does it say about sports, masculinity, violence and indeed broadcasting, where the dominant view given is one commanding injurious violence?  Indeed, the polarised responses to this on social media are also interesting:

Wil Wheaton @wilw

Mike Milbury is just a horrible suit away from going full Don Cherry tonight, and it’s glorious. #SJSvsSTL #StanleyCup @NHLonNBCSports


James Gralian@Tapeleg

Wow, Mike Milbury advocated violence and injury. In a hockey game. You don’t say.


The comments on news stories are always interesting with any story of sports violence.  On the one hand fans of Don Cherry’s Old School Rock ’em Sock ’em style of hockey maintain that Milbury was right, that we are taking safety too seriously – leading to an overly cautious response from players when administering their hits, checks and slashes.  These supporters are often critical of the aim to reduce hitting in junior hockey, claiming that sports are an avenue for physical combat and should be allowed to retain a physical nature.

On the other hand, we have a wealth of hockey researchers, scientists, organisations and indeed many hockey parents or players themselves warning that a more cautious approach is needed.  The rise in awareness of brain injuries and the ongoing legal battles between the NHL and individual players are causing a sea-change in our acceptance of injurious violence in the sport.

The Canadian Paediatric Society recently advocated that contact in junior hockey be drastically reduced.  This has brought about similarly polarised opinions, as has  researcher-suggested  tackling in rugby in the UK.

It seems likely that Milbury is a step behind this change and did not expect his comments to be taken as seriously as they have been, but his comments and the ongoing reaction to them illustrates what is an interesting time in the changing culture of sports violence.

What are your thoughts on this? Follow the conversation on Twitter @SilverwoodVS

Dr Victoria Silverwood, Lecturer in Criminology, Birmingham City University.


One thought on “I only said “SLIGHT concussion”: Mike Milbury calls for injurious violence in NHL Playoffs

  1. Pingback: Mike Milbury in hot water; Scottie Upshall on Fort McMurray wildfires; South Korean women’s team focusing on 2018 Olympics; and more | Hockey in Society

Please read our Comments Policy (in "About" section of the blog) before commenting. Comments will be screened for approval by an Editor before being posted.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s